L
localai.computer
ModelsGPUsSystemsAI SetupsBuildsOpenClawMethodology

Resources

  • Methodology
  • Submit Benchmark
  • About

Browse

  • AI Models
  • GPUs
  • PC Builds

Guides

  • OpenClaw Guide
  • How-To Guides

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact

© 2025 localai.computer. Hardware recommendations for running AI models locally.

ℹ️We earn from qualifying purchases through affiliate links at no extra cost to you. This supports our free content and research.

  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Compare
  4. Phi-4 vs Llama
Model ComparisonUpdated December 2025

Phi-4 vs Llama

Microsoft vs Meta small models

Quick VerdictTie

Phi-4 wins on benchmarks, Llama wins on context and creativity. Both are excellent small models.

Choose Phi-4 14B if:

Choose Phi-4 for reasoning, math, and when you need MIT licensing.

Choose Llama 3.1 8B if:

Choose Llama 8B for long context, creative writing, and chat applications.

Phi-4 is Microsoft's remarkably efficient small model. How does it compare to Llama 3 at similar sizes?

Specifications

SpecificationPhi-4 14BLlama 3.1 8B
DeveloperMicrosoftMeta
Parameters14B8B
Context Length16K128K
VRAM (Minimum)8GB (Q4)6GB (Q4)
VRAM (Recommended)12GB8GB
Release DateDecember 2024July 2024
LicenseMITLlama 3.1 Community License

Benchmark Comparison

CategoryPhi-4 14BLlama 3.1 8BWinner
MMLU78.0%69.4%Phi-4 14B
Math (GSM8K)89.0%84.5%Phi-4 14B
Context Length16K128KLlama 3.1 8B
Creative WritingGoodVery GoodLlama 3.1 8B
LicenseMITCommunityPhi-4 14B
Phi-4 14B
by Microsoft

Strengths

  • Incredible efficiency
  • Punches above weight class
  • MIT license
  • Great at reasoning

Weaknesses

  • Smaller context
  • Less creative
  • Concise outputs

Best For

Reasoning tasksBudget GPUsWhen efficiency matters
How to Run Phi-4 14B Locally →
Llama 3.1 8B
by Meta

Strengths

  • Massive context
  • Better creative writing
  • Larger ecosystem
  • More natural responses

Weaknesses

  • Lower raw benchmarks than Phi-4
  • Community license limitations

Best For

Long documentsCreative tasksChat applications
How to Run Llama 3.1 8B Locally →

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, Phi-4 14B outperforms many 70B models on reasoning benchmarks. Microsoft's training data curation is exceptional.
Llama 8B is faster due to fewer parameters. Phi-4 14B needs more compute but delivers better quality.
Phi-4 uses MIT license - fully open. Llama has restrictions for 700M+ monthly user services.

Related Comparisons

Read Gemma vs Llama
Gemma vs Llama
Read Llama vs Mistral
Llama vs Mistral

Need Hardware for These Models?

Check our GPU buying guides to find the right hardware for running LLMs locally.