L
localai.computer
ModelsGPUsSystemsAI SetupsBuildsOpenClawMethodology

Resources

  • Methodology
  • Submit Benchmark
  • About

Browse

  • AI Models
  • GPUs
  • PC Builds

Guides

  • OpenClaw Guide
  • How-To Guides

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact

© 2025 localai.computer. Hardware recommendations for running AI models locally.

ℹ️We earn from qualifying purchases through affiliate links at no extra cost to you. This supports our free content and research.

  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Compare
  4. SDXL vs Flux
Model ComparisonUpdated December 2025

SDXL vs Flux

Stability AI vs Black Forest Labs

Quick VerdictFlux.1 Dev Wins

Flux produces noticeably better images, especially for text and complex scenes. SDXL wins on accessibility and ecosystem.

Choose Stable Diffusion XL if:

Choose SDXL if you have 10-12GB VRAM, need specific LoRAs, or prioritize speed.

Choose Flux.1 Dev if:

Choose Flux if you have 16GB+ VRAM and want the best possible image quality.

SDXL and Flux are the two leading open image generation models. Both run locally and produce stunning results.

Specifications

SpecificationStable Diffusion XLFlux.1 Dev
DeveloperStability AIBlack Forest Labs
Parameters~6.6B~12B
Context Length77 tokensUnlimited (T5)
VRAM (Minimum)10GB16GB
VRAM (Recommended)12GB24GB
Release DateJuly 2023August 2024
LicenseCreativeML Open RAIL++-MFlux Dev License

Benchmark Comparison

CategoryStable Diffusion XLFlux.1 DevWinner
Image QualityVery GoodExcellentFlux.1 Dev
Text RenderingPoorExcellentFlux.1 Dev
Prompt FollowingGoodExcellentFlux.1 Dev
Speed (4090)~3s/image~8s/imageStable Diffusion XL
VRAM Required10-12GB16-24GBStable Diffusion XL
LoRA EcosystemMassiveGrowingStable Diffusion XL
Stable Diffusion XL
by Stability AI

Strengths

  • Mature ecosystem
  • Tons of LoRAs/fine-tunes
  • Lower VRAM needs
  • Faster generation

Weaknesses

  • Lower quality than Flux
  • Struggles with text
  • Older architecture

Best For

Budget GPUsWhen you need specific LoRAsFaster workflows
How to Run Stable Diffusion XL Locally →
Flux.1 Dev
by Black Forest Labs

Strengths

  • Best image quality
  • Excellent text rendering
  • Better prompt understanding
  • More coherent images

Weaknesses

  • Higher VRAM needs
  • Slower
  • Smaller fine-tune ecosystem

Best For

Best quality outputsText in imagesComplex prompts
How to Run Flux.1 Dev Locally →

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, noticeably. Flux produces more coherent, detailed images with better text rendering. The quality gap is significant.
Flux Schnell (fast variant) can run on 12GB with optimizations. Flux Dev really needs 16GB+ for good results.
If you have 16GB+ VRAM and don't rely heavily on specific SDXL LoRAs, yes. The quality improvement is worth it.

Related Comparisons

Read Midjourney vs Stable Diffusion
Midjourney vs Stable Diffusion

Need Hardware for These Models?

Check our GPU buying guides to find the right hardware for running LLMs locally.